It is obvious that 
                    our society as a whole is passive as well as its individual 
                    members.
                    We are only jumping 
                    on a subject without analysing it, without analysing the 
                    reasons behind it.  The same is true in the field of  
                    Philosophy and Mysticism.
                    ‘’Philosophy is to 
                    search for the truth in the 
                    multiplicity 
                    along the numbers starting from an empty center, whereas 
                    religion is the institution of  contemplating about the 
                    ‘One’ in the 
                    multiplicity after having attained it.  
                    From this point 
                    religion and philosophy are two thought systems which are 
                    completely leading to opposite directions namely; one is 
                    leading to the north and the other is leading to the south. 
                     Of course, this is the Islamic rule for value.
                    Philosophy is not  a 
                    tool for finding the truth, but it is the tool for finding 
                    out the mistakes of  one another  and being deprived of  the 
                    truth eternally.’’
                    The above lines have 
                    been written by Necip Fazýl Kýsakürek.  I do not know why he 
                    has said these and for what purpose.  However, when we look 
                    at the truth, what we can is  that the situation is not  the 
                    same as it has been stated. 
                    Exactly at this 
                    point I would like to make an analysis, because I am 
                    thinking differently.
                    Let me explain!
                    
                    I would like to 
                    start by giving an example of  how we can approach a subject 
                    from the philosophical point of view :- 
                    Upon the wish of  
                    the absolute consciousness the planets are  rotating both 
                    around themselves and around the sun in their never changing 
                    fixed orbits.  During these rotations the time, the days 
                    that emerge through the night, the seasons and the climates 
                    come into being.
                    If, only for an 
                    instant they start acting independently can you imagine what 
                    the universe would  be like?
                    So,  what is wrong  
                    in philosophizing in this manner?  Could you explain me what 
                    is contradictory with the truth, with the logic in this 
                    process?
                    Yes, this branch of 
                    science which is described  as the most harmful insect on 
                    earth actually teaches the people how to think in a 
                    systematic way. It helps to form connections between 
                    abstract concepts. However, it is always perceived as 
                    ‘’a little bit of  an 
                    unnecessary luxury’’ and from time to time we see 
                    it as a thought concept that has been 
                    endured by the masses by 
                    means of  pressure, but which has not been 
                    accepted truly.
                    Such thoughts that 
                    are aimed to make the societies more lively  tell the people 
                    the truth, they tell that  no one  can harm others as well 
                    as himself . 
                    This is a point of 
                    view, a principal, but it is neither an assumption nor an 
                    empty thought. 
                    If, life is based on 
                    such an understanding and if  it  is told  in the same 
                    manner, then it becomes obvious that philosophy is not a 
                    harmful thing.
                    Moreover, to what 
                    extent would it  be correct to by pass this science  which 
                    is accepted as the opposite of  mysticism as it does not 
                    cover the real life experiences, practices. This is a 
                    subject that should be debated. 
                    As you know,   there 
                    is an ideal which is a typical example of  the  mystical 
                    thought.  The mystical thought tries to hold it up like a 
                     flag and this is  ideal is 
                    
                    ‘’to be in unity’’.
                    However, most of the 
                    time this ideal that we have mentioned above is not put into 
                    practice and it is not experienced. 
                    Moreover, if, every 
                    idea had been put into practice, then the dimension that is 
                    named as ‘’certainty’’ 
                    wouldn’t become  manifest. This means  that there wouldn’t 
                    be any variety, anyhow   it is even impossible to dream of 
                    such a thing. 
                    My dear friends!
                    
                    If  the concept that 
                    we have mentioned above covers the aspects contemplation, 
                    divine reason and ideas, if it is in conformity with the 
                    system, especially if it  does not have obvious 
                    contradictions  with the religion than there is nothing 
                    wrong in accepting it. 
                    I am saying these 
                    for the ones who are not fond of philosophy so that they 
                    would at least  accept it.