ometimes, even those people who have dedicated themselves to the positive sciences cannot prove the concepts based on assumptions.
If they can prove they feel the pleasure of  having reached a certain level, a maturity from the ‘’point of science’’….

For example, the material  which is called  water can take the  form of every pot in which it is placed and it is transparent. When it is examined by scientific methods,it can be seen that water is the result of a chemical reaction where two volumes of  hydrogen are combined with one volume  of  oxygen at a temperature of  +4 degrees centigrade.

In short,we can say that water exists as a result of a chemical composition.

However, this conclusion that the science has reached can be possible only on this planet as the ‘’earth’’.  It is not possible to have the same result on the panet Pluto whose atmospheric structure and conditions are much more different than ours...

Furthermore, in some cases, the proofs that are shown by the science do not give the same results in different circumstances even in the laboratory conditions.

For example, the Euclidean geometry has made the statement ‘’The closest distance between two points is a straight line’’, whereas the Spheric geometry says that this distance can only be measured by a curve. So, the first statement cannot insist as being right against the second one…

Similarly, among the wrong examples is the one which states  that when the speed of  light is exceeded, then it is possible to go ‘’further’’ in time.
Whereas, on the contrary if we travel faster than the speed of light, then we go backwards in time. Suppose that we shall make a tour around the earth at a speed equal to the speed of light, we shall be arriving at our starting point before the time of our start, before we have started our journey…

When the scientific understanding which is based on concrete data shows such a change or a stagnancy, then things become really difficult for us to  understand…

If all the different concepts had been evaluated within such a narrow scale, then there wouldn’t be any necessity for the different theories put forth by the positive science and it wouldn’t be possible to accept the ideas of  the extraordinary individuals…

It seems certain that in the coming years there would be lots of  advancements in the research and the findings in this field…

Also, in the mystical field the position of  the units who think about the wholeness and indivisibility of the existence and who say that while doing so they refer to scientific data is not so much different…

Unfortunately, the mystical  look cannot be as sensitive as it should be in accepting the conditions which determine the relative social values. Most probably this is due to the value judgements brought along by the conditionings and the genetic heritage.

Ofcourse, in such a case there is neither the  positive sciences nor  the understanding of getting saved from the taboos.
The already known behaviour continues without having any doubt regarding the ethical aspect.
This is not a pessimistic criticism, it is only determiningthe existing situation…

In my opinion, mysticism and the conditions that would be brought along by Allah’s science should be perceived by relating them to the positive sciences.
As a result, by making use of these a point of view should be formed such that it would give pleasure to all!..

However, it is really surprising that the humans prefer to look at the events with a narrow look, through  the horse glasses and they still keep on insisting that the positive science has contributions to mysticism. Believe me, this is a mistake which cannot be forgiven…
It is impossible to think that science which prepares the individuals for different dimensions will make a change in the opinions of  those who continue their lives in the direction of their feelings…

Hz.Muhyiddin Arabi in the Şuayp says:-
‘’If people knew about ‘’the colour of the sufi is the colour of the water’’, the words of Cüneyd Baghdad-I, one of the most important personalities of the Islamic world, then they would accept the beliefs of the other people and would recognise Allah in every image and belief.  However, man has opinions and he does not have science.  This is the reason why Allah has said ‘’I am with respect to the opinion that each of my people has about me’’.

In other words ‘’I can be visible to him  within the framework of his belief . He can think of me as he wishes, either as absolute or as relative(ly).
By these words, the individual is being invited to go beyond his feelings and  find out what is correct, isn’t that so?
If  I summarize what I’ve said, I can frankly say that  there is nothing more absurd than a human being who thinks that he would reach his essence in spite of the fact that he lives the concept of causality with his feelings and who claims ‘’this is the absolute correct’’ at a certain level…

Istanbul- October 26^th 2000 
http://afyuksel.com