Although,
as a
society
we seem
to talk
much, in
reality
it
cannot
be said
that we
get
along
with
each
other
well.
For this
reason
our
problems
become
bigger
and huge
like the
mountains.
This is
the
social
impression.
There
may be
the ones
among us
who
state
firmly
that we
are
talking
with
each
other,
communicating.
Then, I
would
like to
ask them
‘’what
are we
talking
about’’.
In the
first
place
quick
conversations
between
friends,
sharing
the
daily
subjects
is not
the
conversation
that I
mean.
The
reason
is that
in the
above
kind
there
isn’t
any
exchange
of ideas.
There is
only a
physical
discharge.
In the
repetitions
that
make
everybody
fed up there
isn’t
the approach
that is
required.
Moreover,
the
dictations
made by
someone
who
accepts
himself
as an
authority
does not
bring
along
this
concept.
Sometimes,
the
things
that you
are
talking
about do
not have
any
importance.
However,
it is
thought
that
something
is
shared.
There
are the
ones who
go to
extremes
while
they are
talking.
They
even do
not
think
of
letting
others
speak.
This
attitude
does not
mean to
establish
a
dialogue.
It is
more of
a
monologue.
Useless
explanations
and the
details
about
that
subject
do not
make the
desired
effect
and
people
get used
to them,
they
regard
them as
something
ordinary
and
sometimes
these
explanations
go in
from one
ear and
come out
from the
other.
In short,
in
anyone
who says
that he
is
speaking
(giving
a speech)
there
isn’t an
accumulation
of
knowledge,
neither
a habit
of
informing
the
humans
nor the
formation
of the
culture
of
listening.
We
become
unable
to
realize
the
worth of
this
speech.
The
important
thing is
not to
skip the
core,
the
essence
of the
matter.
Therefore,
it
shouldn’t
be long.
To know
and
realize
this is
the
most
important
sign of
being
developed.
Whereas,
being
primitive
shows
itself
by not
understanding
how
valuable
the
statements
that
come out
of the
mouth
and
behaving
harshly
towards
people.
Sometimes,
we
become
proud
of what
the ones
ones who
speak
nice and
who
exhibit
the art
of
speaking
are
saying.
Anyone
who has
the
talent
of
giving a
speech
and who
plans
the
sentences
and who
shapes
the
miracles
within
them
seems to
us like
a
great-unique
artist.
And this
individual
is being
admired
and
followed
with
admiration.
Think
of a
scene:
The
members
of the
society
have
come
together
and they
are
going to
exchange
ideas
about a
subject.
However,
one of
them
keeps on
whispering
to his
friend
without
stopping.
He
behaves
as if
there is
no one
around.
While
their
comments
follow
one
another
they
cannot
become
aware
of the
looks
of the
people
around.
It was
expected
that
they
should
be
respectful
‘’not
only to
themselves’’,
but ‘’to
the
people
near them
too’’.
However,
this
cannot
be done.
Is it
necessary
for
someone
to warn
them and
say ‘’gentlemen
this is
not the
place
for
such a
behaviour’’
!
The
people
are
speaking
continuously,
but they
are not
even
aware of
what
they are
talking
about.
No
matter
what
happens
they
love to
talk
very
much.
What is
the use
of this?
Sometimes
the one
who
wants to
speak
does not
have the
courage
to do so.
HE
thinks
that if
he
speaks
people
would
not like
it and
refuse.
‘’Is
this
possible?’’
However,
when we
take
into
consideration
the
similar
samples
in the
society
it seems
that
this has
a high
probability.
However,
sharing
only the
daily
events
is not
satisfactory
for the
individual.
When we
talk of
speaking
the
subjects
of
mysticism
come to
my mind
as they
are
beneficial.
Sometimes,
in order
to be
useful to
the
people
around,
it seems
compulsory
by
staying
silent
for a
long
time and
sometimes
by
speaking
to them.
If, the
things
are in
accordance
with
Allah’s
statements,
then
everybody
will be
content
and
think
that it
is
satisfactory.
However,
a
conversation
which
does not
have any
‘’gossip
or
discord’’
within
it is
always
valid,
because
this is
necessary
both for
the
daily
life,
the
afterlife
and for
the one
who
wants to
find his
essence.
Normally,
speaking
fills up
the
emptiness
(within).
However,
it is
not
correct
to make
comments
that
lead to
reactions
as well
as
categorical
narrowness
and
using sharp
and
surrealistic
abstractions
which do
not care
about
the
whole.
It is
certain
that
those
who want
to learn
and who
ask this
from us
cannot
be
prisoned
to
silence.
We do
not have
the
right to
do such
a thing.
Such
a
behaviour
may
bring
out
doubts,
anxieties,
false
conjectures
and
difficulties.
These
prevent
the
production
of ideas.
You
cannot
find the
way to
make a
speech
if you
by pass
the
individual. |